🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.